<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>CausaMind — Latest resources</title>
<link>https://agentdiagonstics.com/</link>
<description>Newly added papers, benchmarks, and tools on AI agent diagnostics and optimization, curated by CausaMind.</description>
<language>en</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<atom:link href="https://agentdiagonstics.com/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
<item>
<title>Beyond Task Completion: Revealing Corrupt Success in LLM Agents through Procedure-Aware Evaluation</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03116</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/beyond-task-completion</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Evaluation</category>
<description>An audit of tau-bench with procedure-aware evaluation: re-scoring reported successes against the procedures agents actually followed finds 27–78% of them corrupt — success without the required steps. Under gated Pass^4, headline scores collapse (GPT-5 0.58 → 0.24; Mistral 0.46 → 0.03). Because the audit cannot recall every corrupt run, these rates are lower bounds.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>From Trajectories to Differentiated Skills: Cognitive Differentiation for Self-Improving Agents</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23599</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/trajectories-to-differentiated-skills</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Agent harness</category>
<description>Treats each skill as four coordinated parts (Meta, Experience, Tool, Script) updated separately from success and failure evidence. Finds most real skill packages blur these roles; the split method topped all 36 benchmark, model and harness settings tested.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>JevAgentHarness: Benchmarking, Deploying and Training Decision Models That Share Control with LLMs</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21412</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/jevagentharness</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Agent harness</category>
<description>Frequent small decisions inside a harness, like which tool next, can go to a cheap decision model instead of an LLM call. A 4B model trained on post-mistake states made agents much cheaper and faster with little success loss.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>What Survives Self-Evolution: Provenance Marks in Copied Agent Harnesses</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21458</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/provenance-marks-copied-harnesses</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Agent harness</category>
<description>Harnesses leak, and a plagiarist can launder one through a self-evolver. Measured marks mostly fail to survive; survival depends on the rewriting model. The authors' alternative keys a mark to the ordering of near-tied entries in a task-critical lookup table.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MS-Eval: Benchmarking Sub-Agent Delegation and Orchestration in MCP-Intensive Working Scenarios</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22869</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/ms-eval</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Agent harness</category>
<description>An evaluation kit for main agents that delegate to specialised sub-agents over MCP: benchmark, execution harness, delegation metrics and a composite index. Specialisation helped in practice; delegation raised cost, helping most open models but sometimes hurting closed ones.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MemScope: Evolving Agent Memory Architectures through Localized Code Repair</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21170</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/memscope</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Agent design</category>
<description>A patch agent reads execution traces, runtime memory state and the memory architecture's own code to locate failures and apply small bounded repairs instead of rewrites: gains on GAIA, xBench and unseen ALFWorld with a median code change of 4.4%.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Testing the Planning Claims of LLM-Based Agents against Formal Semantics</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22469</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/testing-planning-claims</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Agent design</category>
<description>Agent planning claims checked against hidden PDDL ground truth. The best setup solves 78% of solvable tasks offline but 40% online and recognises unsolvable tasks under 10% of the time; differences trace to the model more than to prompting or architecture.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sample, Mix, or Verify? Allocating Test-Time Compute under Imperfect Verifiers</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23255</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/sample-mix-or-verify</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Optimization</category>
<description>How to split a fixed test-time budget between more samples, model mixing and verification when the verifier itself errs. SPLIT uses a small labelled pilot and an exact success-probability formula that accounts for correlated verifier mistakes.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>RSIFlow: Adaptive Self-Improvement Workflows with an Evolving Meta-Agent</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21791</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/rsiflow</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Optimization</category>
<description>A meta-agent reads agent trajectories and feedback to diagnose bottlenecks, picks a component-specific improvement workflow, and distils results into skills and principles that evolve its own harness. Best average across six benchmarks and two backbones in the paper's tests.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Darwin-Claw: Environment-Adaptive Experience Consolidation for Recursively Self-Evolving Agents</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23574</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/darwin-claw</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Optimization</category>
<description>Instead of replaying raw trajectories, this framework consolidates experience hierarchically: fine-grained error attributions distilled into updatable prototype vectors that steer skill and memory refinement. Reports gains on WildClawBench.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>GACC-Bench: Benchmarking Goal-Adaptive Context Compression Ability across Large Language Models</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21893</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/gacc-bench</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Evaluation</category>
<description>500 goals and 2,571 questions test whether a compressor keeps what matters for a stated goal under a length budget. Even the best of ten compressors trails full context; the right goal helps, the wrong goal actively hurts.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignored, Not Refused: What Low Prompt-Injection Success Rates Hide in Small Tool-Using Agents</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23254</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/ignored-not-refused</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Evaluation</category>
<description>Across 33,000 trajectories from eleven small agents, most failed injections were silently ignored rather than refused, and system-prompt changes alone swung attack success widely. Argues injection evals should report how attacks fail, not just whether they succeed.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>AuditKIT: A Unified Evaluation Spine for Benchmarking, Judging, and Comparing Large Language Models and Agentic Systems</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22511</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/auditkit</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Evaluation</category>
<description>One result representation for benchmark accuracy, judge scores, runtime behaviour, tool-use traces and retrieval quality, keeping verified outcomes separate from trajectory diagnostics and marking unobservable evidence as unscored rather than failed.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>SIT-Eval: Situation-Based Interactive Turn-by-Turn Evaluation of Conversational Agents</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23612</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/sit-eval</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Evaluation</category>
<description>Behaviour specified as situational if-then rules; at each turn an interlocutor enacts a sampled situation and a judge scores the reply against every applicable rule. Exposes per-rule failure modes that aggregate benchmark scores hide.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>AgentLoupe: Kernel-Resident Semantic Causal Labels for AI Agent Observability</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23233</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/agentloupe</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Observability</category>
<description>An eBPF-based observability layer that tags each LLM interaction with a causal label at kernel level and follows it across processes, threads, files and sockets, so delayed or cross-process side effects can still be attributed to the interaction that caused them, at under 8% average overhead.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Annotrace: A Workbench for Step-Level Annotation of Agent Traces</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23284</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/annotrace</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Observability</category>
<description>Failure studies start with hand-labelled traces, and every team rebuilds its own labelling tool. Annotrace imports six trace formats, splits runs into nested steps, and lets humans and models label failure points against a shared codebook with measured agreement.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>When Can You Trust an Agent's Own Verifier? Stress-Testing Counterfactual Rationale Verification Under Search Pressure and Oracle Access</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22779</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/trust-agents-own-verifier</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Failure analysis</category>
<description>A stress-test method for agents that verify their own rationales: negate each claimed benefit and re-check, scored by a pressure ratio and falsifiable probes. Applied to the authors' own verifier, early oracle access quietly degraded held-out faithfulness.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Self-Evolving Agents Can Repair Failures but Struggle to Generalize from Them</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22984</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/self-evolving-agents-repair-failures</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Failure analysis</category>
<description>When agents learn only from failed interactions, the experience fixes the tasks that produced it but rarely transfers to new ones - a repair-generalization gap that success trajectories do not show. A caution for any self-improvement loop trained on failure logs.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Robust Function Calling for LLM Agents Under Interface Drift</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23342</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/robust-function-calling-interface-drift</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Failure analysis</category>
<description>Tools change after deployment: descriptions, schemas, candidate lists. This paper names that interface drift, measures which changes hurt most (distractor tools in the candidate set), and adds a training-free validation-and-repair layer that recovers much of the lost accuracy.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>ruvnet/ruflo</title>
<link>https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agentdiagonstics.com/resources/review-rest-340</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<category>Agent harness</category>
<description>Adds coordination, persistent memory, tools, and workflow controls around coding agents; project performance claims need workload-specific validation.</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
